Why a second map?
“Why does the canon analyse the same experience a second time?”
Finished for now
The discourses speak to persons in situations. The Abhidhamma takes the same teaching and sets it out without persons and without situations: processes only, enumerated and ordered. This stage explains the difference between designation and what is ultimate, and names the four things that remain standing after this analysis.
The ultimate paramattha Concept paññatti Consciousness (moment) citta Mental factor cetasika Form, materiality rūpa The unconditioned nibbāna Matrix of headings mātikā
What these terms mean — Stage 1: Why a second map?
- The ultimate paramattha
- What remains standing when the analysis is done: consciousness, mental factor, materiality, Nibbāna — as against mere designation (paññatti).
- Concept paññatti
- What exists as a designation only — name, shape, person, direction, time. In the Abhidhamma it stands against what is ultimate (paramattha).
- Consciousness (moment) citta
- Consciousness; a single moment of consciousness.
- Mental factor cetasika
- A mental factor that accompanies a citta and colours it (52 of them according to the Abhidhamma).
- Form, materiality rūpa
- The first aggregate: bodily, material form, the four great elements and what is derived from them.
- The unconditioned nibbāna
- The unconditioned; the going out of the fuel.
- Matrix of headings mātikā
- The pairs and triads of terms set out at the front, along which the works of the Abhidhamma Piṭaka work through their material.