advanced canonical teaching

Out of what it arises

“If no doer is there — who then bears the consequences?”

Chapter XVII is the longest of the book and treats dependent arising link by link. From this the fourth purification draws a single consequence: in one who has grasped the conditions of the mental and the material, doubt about past, present and future falls away.

For reading

Editorial explanation — quotations are marked as Canonical text and linked.

In one sentence

The fourth purification is reached when the question about the bearer has been replaced by insight into the conditions — and with it doubt about past and future disappears.

In today's language

The previous stage ended with a hole: no being, no person. Whoever takes that seriously has a question at once. If nobody is there who acts — who then acts? And if nobody is there whom it befalls — why does it befall anyone at all?

Chapter XVII is the answer, and it is by a long way the longest chapter of the book. It goes through the twelve links: ignorance — formations — consciousness — mental and material — the six sense bases — contact — feeling — craving — clinging — becoming — birth — ageing and death. Each link is determined, and for each it is shown in what relation it stands to the next.

The formula with which the book sums the matter up is hard: no doer is there, none whom the effect befalls — and the wheel of existence is twelvefold empty. And then the explanation follows at once, so that one does not take the sentence wrongly. It does not say that nothing happens. It says that this wheel needs no further producer — no Brahmā, no creator, no self behind the process. The conditions suffice.

Chapter XIX draws the consequence and gives it a name: purification by overcoming doubt. In one who has grasped the conditions of the mental and the material, the doubts about the three times fall away.

Why this matters

Because at this place one can go wrong in two directions, and the canon names both of them.

The one: there is a bearer who does the deeds and collects the consequences. The other: there is no bearer, so there are no consequences either. SN 12.15 is written exactly for this — the world relies on two things, on “it is” and on “it is not”, and the Buddha teaches in the middle of them, namely dependent arising.

The Visuddhimagga follows this middle. There is deed and there is effect. There is only nobody in between who administers the two.

Canonical basis

SN 12.2 is the passage in which the twelve links are determined one by one; chapter XVII works through them in order. SN 12.20 contains the sentence the manual needs again and again: conditionality stands firm whether a Perfect One appears or not — and the noble disciple then no longer asks what he was in the past or will be in the future. Precisely these questions are the doubt that chapter XIX clears away.

MN 9 goes through the links backwards and attaches four points to each: what it is, out of what it arises, what its ceasing is and which way leads there. That is the form in which the practitioner of the manual works too.

Components

  • Twelve links, read as a wheel, not as a chain with a beginning.
  • Three times: the links are distributed over past, present and future existence — the book names three connections and four sections.
  • The sixteenfold doubt: five questions about the past, five about the future, six about the present.
  • The conditions of the material: karma, consciousness, temperature, nutriment.
  • Impersonal working and no transmigration of a soul — two sections of their own in chapter XIX, which take up exactly the misunderstandings that arise here.

Connection with other teachings

Dependent arising is the second truth worked out: out of what suffering arises. Read backwards it is the third: what ceases with the ceasing of the condition. And the link “craving” is the place at which the practitioner can begin — not at ignorance, which is no beginning, but between feeling and craving, where mindfulness takes hold.

Significance for practice

The practical yield of this chapter is inconspicuous: it stops feeling worthwhile to brood over one's own history. Not because that would be forbidden, but because the question loses its object as soon as one sees that conditions stand in its place.

SN 12.20 puts this without pathos: the noble disciple does not run back into the past — “what was I?” — nor forward into the future, and is not inwardly confused about the present.

Common misinterpretations

“Karma means fate.” The manual lists four conditions for the material, and karma is only one of them. Temperature, nutriment and consciousness are the others. Not everything that happens is the consequence of an earlier deed.

“Without a self there is no rebirth.” Chapter XIX has a section of its own for this: no transmigration of a soul — and nevertheless connection. What goes on is the condition, not a traveller.

“The chain begins with ignorance.” It begins nowhere. The book says expressly that a first beginning is not to be discerned; ignorance stands at the beginning of the enumeration, not at the beginning of the matter.

What you now have in hand

  • name the twelve links of dependent arising in order
  • explain why the book reads them as a wheel and not as a chain with a beginning
  • reproduce what the sixteenfold doubt is and by what it falls
  • explain the formula “deed without a doer” without abolishing responsibility
  • say why this purification is called “purification by overcoming doubt”

Key terms of this stage

  • Dependent arising paṭiccasamuppāda

    Dependent arising; the twelve conditionally linked links, without a self running through them.

    Note for myself
    My progress on Dependent arising
  • Condition paccaya

    The way in which one thing carries another. The Paṭṭhāna sets out twenty-four such ways.

    Note for myself
    My progress on Condition
  • Intention and action kamma

    Action as intentional doing (kamma), with consequences: what is done out of greed, hate or delusion bears different fruit than what is done in their absence. The canon means intention, deed and effect by it — not a ledger of fate.

    Note for myself
    My progress on Intention and action
  • Craving taṇhā

    The thirst that turns experience into suffering: craving for sensual pleasures, for existence, for non-existence. The second noble truth names taṇhā as the origin of dukkha.

    Note for myself
    My progress on Craving
  • Clinging upādāna

    The holding on that grows out of craving: to sense objects, to views, to rules and observances, to the idea of a self. The five aggregates become a burden only through clinging.

    Note for myself
    My progress on Clinging
  • Not-self anattā

    Not-self; without a lasting core that one could own or command.

    Note for myself
    My progress on Not-self

Markings are stored only in this browser.

Further reading optional

Name and form nāmarūpa Consciousness viññāṇa Suffering, unsatisfactoriness dukkha Four noble truths cattāri ariyasaccāni

Source texts Canonical text

  • SN 12.2 — The twelve links determined one by one: what each of them designates exactly — the textual ground of chapter XVII
  • SN 12.15 — Kaccānagotta: the middle way between “it is” and “it is not” — the passage where dependent arising appears as the answer to a metaphysical question
  • SN 12.20 — Conditionality stands firm whether a Buddha appears or not — and the closing words about the one who stops asking what he was in the past
  • MN 9 — Sāriputta goes through the links backwards, each with its arising, its ceasing and the way to its ceasing
Further source texts (2)
  • AN 10.60 — Ten perceptions, among them those of impermanence and not-self — applied to this very conditioned process
  • SN 22.79 — The formations are that which forms — the explanation of the link that appears in the manual as “karma formations”

In the book itself

“Kein Täter da ist, keiner den die Wirkung trifft.”

In other words: There is no doer here, and none whom the effect befalls.

Vis. XVII — zum Daseinsrad

“Als Reinheit der Zweifelentrinnung gilt diejenige Erkenntnis, die durch Erfassung der Bedingungen (paccaya-pariggaha) eben dieses Geistigen und Körperlichen (nāma-rūpa) allem Zweifel hinsichtlich der drei Zeiten entronnen ist.”

In other words: Purification by overcoming doubt is that knowledge which, by grasping the conditions (paccaya-pariggaha) of this very mental and material (nāma-rūpa), has escaped all doubt regarding the three times.

Vis. XIX.1 — Reinheit der Zweifelentrinnung

The chapters this stage deals with — they are readable in full under Study on this site:

For reflection

“No doer, and none whom the effect befalls” — does that abolish responsibility?

No, it sharpens it. The sentence denies a bearer alongside the process, not the connection of deed and consequence. On the contrary: because no self stands in between that could take over the account or pass it on, the deed works on directly. The manual names this expressly as the reason why no Brahmā is needed as a producer.

Why is this a “purification by overcoming doubt”?

Because the doubts that fall here all have the same form: was I in the past? shall I be in the future? what am I now? The canon counts sixteen such questions. They fall not because one answers them but because they lose their object as soon as one sees the conditions.

Does the chain begin with ignorance?

The book expressly says no: ignorance is named as the first link, not as a beginning. It arises itself from the taints, and they from it. There is no first link; otherwise the wheel would be no wheel.